Kakaire2-Entanglement
Kakaire2-Atomic Physics: Entanglement
Entanglement: Einstein-Bohr Debate Over
In this article 1 of X, James Kakaire introduces a new entanglement science that settles the Einstein-Bohr debate for good. Einstein was right but just didn’t have the science to prove it. Bohr was wrong!
About 100 years ago, there was a scientific debate between scientists of the time. Niels Bohr on one side argued quantum systems truly exist as a fuzzy mixture of all possible properties (A superposition of states). He continued that the universe has meaning only at moments of measurement, and that measuring one of two entangled particles would instantly change properties of the other. Albert Einstein and his two colleagues on the other side insisted on a reality independent of our observation of it and that quantum mechanics is incomplete. The trio argued that there must exist hidden variables that reflect a more physical underlying reality, and that every point in the universe must be real and physical, and defined by knowable quantities. The debate was unresolved.
In 1964, John Stewart Bell proposed an experiment to resolve the debate. The experiment which was based on measurement just as Bohr had said, sided with Bohr but it was only a quantum experiment without classical physics. The test conducted on Bell’s experiment was probabilistic with improper inputs. However, 21st century scientists still believe in Niels Bohr and his group.
How can a human not even 100 years old measure a particle that has existed for millions or even billions of years, and think that their measurements do change properties of a counter particle of the measured particle ! Isn’t that funny?
Did Bohr think he could measure the earth and change properties of the moon?
A scientific argument needs to be accompanied by a scientific proof and needs to demonstrate its application in real life. Thus, a valid quantum experiment must demonstrate its application to classical physics.
Kakaire proves that Bohr was wrong. Einstein and his colleagues were right not because they had a correct answer, but they knew that something was missing.
At some point, Einstein stated that “the destiny of the two observed particles, was already fixed long before we observed themâ€, and he was right with that, but he just didn’t have the science to prove so.
The missing “something” (science) Einstein and his colleagues didn’t know was dark energy.
In order to understand entanglement, one has to understand dark energy.
In 2010 James Kakaire published that he had discovered dark energy. In the following year, 2011, a Nobel prize in physics was given out for dark energy. Up to today however, the universe is estimated to be 68 % dark energy but there is no concrete definition that tells what dark energy is and what dark energy does yet the Nobel prize was given out for dark energy!
Utilizing dark energy, James Kakaire demonstrates how entanglement which is still puzzling scientists today (2023) along with dark energy works. Kakaire shows how entanglement applies to quantum mechanics, classical physics, cosmology and astronomy.
This real life proof that does not use analogies to clarify will not only show scientists that entanglement is neither weird nor a spooky action at a distance, but will open up a myriad of research topics in various science fields.
Related videos: